Hearing Schedule

Hearing Schedule

Sr.No. Date & Time Case No. Petitioner Respondent Subject Matter Previous Hearing Date & Time
1 19/11/2016 11:30 am 972/2009
GUVNL
GUVNL
Essar Power Ltd.
Essar Power Ltd.
Petition for adjudication of the dispute that have arisen between the petitioner and the respondents on the in
Petition for adjudication of the dispute that have arisen between the petitioner and the respondents on the interpretation and the implementation of the Power Purchase Agreement dated 30th May, 1996.
__
2 19/11/2016 11:30 am 1397/2014
ACB (India) Limited
ACB (India) Limited
GUVNL
GUVNL
In the matter of petition under section 86 (1) (f) of the Electricity Act,2003 read with Article 13 of the Pow
In the matter of petition under section 86 (1) (f) of the Electricity Act,2003 read with Article 13 of the Power Purchase Agreement dated 26.02.2007 executed between Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited and ACB (India) Limited for adjustment of tariff.
__
3 19/11/2016 11:30 am I.A.No. 5/2014 & I.A.No.5/2016 in Petition No. 111
M/s. Amreli Power Projects Private Limited
M/s. Amreli Power Projects Private Limited
GUVNL, GETCO, GEDA and SLDC
GUVNL, GETCO, GEDA and SLDC
In the matter of re-determination of fuel cost and fixation of tariff and nonapplicability of intra-state avai
In the matter of re-determination of fuel cost and fixation of tariff and nonapplicability of intra-state availability based tariff to the biomass based 10 MW power plant at Amreli under section 62 read with section 86(1) (a) of the Electricity Act, 2003.
__
4 19/11/2016 11:30 am I.A.No. 4/2014 & I.A.No.6/2016 in Petition No. 111
M/s. Junagadh Power Projects Private Limited
M/s. Junagadh Power Projects Private Limited
GUVNL, GETCO, GEDA and SLDC
GUVNL, GETCO, GEDA and SLDC
In the matter of re-determination of fuel cost and fixation of tariff and nonapplicability of intra-state avai
In the matter of re-determination of fuel cost and fixation of tariff and nonapplicability of intra-state availability based tariff to the biomass based 10 MW power plant at Junagadh under section 62 read with section 86(1) (a) of the Electricity Act, 2003.
__
5 19/11/2016 11:30 am I.A.No. 3/2014 & I.A.No.7/2016 in Petition No. 124
M/s. Bhavnagar Biomass Projects Private Limited
M/s. Bhavnagar Biomass Projects Private Limited
GUVNL and GEDA
GUVNL and GEDA
In the matter under section 86(1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 for directions to the respondents to pay th
In the matter under section 86(1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 for directions to the respondents to pay the amounts due to the petitioner in terms of the invoices raised and for re-determination of fuel cost, fixation of tariff of the biomass based 10 MW power plant at Bhavnagar under section 62 read with section 81(1) (a), (b) of the Electricity Act, 2003.
__
6 19/11/2016 11:30 am I.A.No. 8 of 2016 in Petition No. 1024/2010
M/s. Tarini Infrastructure Ltd.
M/s. Tarini Infrastructure Ltd.
GUVNL, Narmada Water Resources and GETCO
GUVNL, Narmada Water Resources and GETCO
Petition for fixation of tariff for two small hydro power projects of 3 MW and 2.6 MW at Daman Ganga Dam/ Madh
Petition for fixation of tariff for two small hydro power projects of 3 MW and 2.6 MW at Daman Ganga Dam/ Madhuban Reservoir under Section 62 read with Section 86 (1) (a) of the EA, 2003.
__
7 19/11/2016 11:30 am 1603/2016
RGE Surat Private Limited (RGESPL)
RGE Surat Private Limited (RGESPL)
GUVNL & Others
GUVNL & Others
In the matter of adjustment of tariff for sale of power to distribution licensee in the State of Gujarat from
In the matter of adjustment of tariff for sale of power to distribution licensee in the State of Gujarat from its 11.5 MW Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) (Gross Power) based Power Project located at Surat, Gujarat.
__
8 19/11/2016 11:30 am 1605/2016
Hindustan Gum & Chemicals Limited
Hindustan Gum & Chemicals Limited
UGVCL
UGVCL
In the matter of challenging the respondent UGVCL’ s letter dated 19.05.2015 that having an effect of not gi
In the matter of challenging the respondent UGVCL’ s letter dated 19.05.2015 that having an effect of not giving separate benefits of Banking of electricity, (a) for a period of 6 months as per Wind Power Generation Policy, 2002 for the petitioner’s Kadoli Wind Mill of 1.25 MW, (b) for a period of 1 month as per Wind Power Generation Policy, 2013 for the petitioner’s Kotdasangani and to quash and set aside the aforesaid letter dated 19.05.2015 under which the respondent refused to give benefit o
__