Hearing Schedule
| Sr.No. | Date & Time | Case No. | Petitioner | Respondent | Subject Matter | Previous Hearing Date & Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13/03/2015 11:30 am | 1456 of 2014 andI.A. No. 09 of 2014 |
Essar Oil Limited
Essar Oil Limited
|
GETCO and PGVCL
GETCO and PGVCL
|
In the matter of filing petition for wrongful levy of Parallel Operation Charges by PGVCL from Essar Oil Limit
In the matter of filing petition for wrongful levy of Parallel Operation Charges by PGVCL from Essar Oil Limited under section 86 (1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with Clause 6 of the Settlement Agreement dated 11.12.2009 executed between Essar Oil Limited and GETCO.
|
__ |
| 2 | 13/03/2015 11:30 am | 1475/2014 |
Reliance Industries Limited
Reliance Industries Limited
|
GETCO
GETCO
|
In the matter of petition under section 86 of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with Regulations 23 and 80 of the
In the matter of petition under section 86 of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with Regulations 23 and 80 of the GERC (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2004 read with Clause 5 of the agreement dated 23.12.2009 executed by the parties and for directions/clarification in regard to the nonapplicability of the further/other POC on increased capacity of the Captive Power Plant at the Petitioner’s Dahej unit in view of the agreement dated 23.12.2009 executed between the parties
|
__ |
| 3 | 13/03/2015 11:30 am | 1404/2014 |
Essar Power Gujarat Limited Essar Power Limited
Essar Power Gujarat Limited Essar Power Limited
|
GUVNL
GUVNL
|
In the matter under section 86 (1) (f) read with 86 (1) (b) of the Electricity Act, 2003 for dispute between a
In the matter under section 86 (1) (f) read with 86 (1) (b) of the Electricity Act, 2003 for dispute between a generating company and the distribution licensee on account of the wrongful deductions carried out by the distribution licensee for the power supplied during the FY 2012- 2013.
|
__ |
| 4 | 13/03/2015 11:30 am | 1429/2014 |
Essar Oil Limited
Essar Oil Limited
|
GETCO and PGVCL
GETCO and PGVCL
|
In the matter of petition under section 86 (1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 for unlawful recovery of Paral
In the matter of petition under section 86 (1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 for unlawful recovery of Parallel Operation Charges by PGVCL qua Essar Oil Limited’s Captive Power Plant operating in parallel with GETCO’s grid for the period from 13.09.2006 till 01.06.2011.
|
__ |
| 5 | 13/03/2015 11:30 am | 1477/2015 and I.A. 1/2015 |
OPGS Power Gujarat Private Limited
OPGS Power Gujarat Private Limited
|
GETCO
GETCO
|
In the matter of petition under section 86 (1) (c) and (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with Regulation 4
In the matter of petition under section 86 (1) (c) and (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with Regulation 45 of the GERC (Terms and Conditions of Intra-State Open Access) Regulations, 2011 and Regulations 80 and 82 of the GERC (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2004 and extension of the effective date of payment of transmission charges under Bulk Power Transmission Agreement dated 21.12.2010 executed between the OPGS Power Gujarat Private Limited and Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Limited
|
__ |
| 6 | 13/03/2015 11:30 am | 1401/2014 |
Essar Steel India Limited
Essar Steel India Limited
|
GECTO and DGVCL
GECTO and DGVCL
|
In the matter of filing petition under section 86 (1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 for refund of Parallel
In the matter of filing petition under section 86 (1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 for refund of Parallel Operation Charges.
|
__ |
| 7 | 13/03/2015 11:30 am | 1424/2014 |
Oreva Energy Private Limited
Oreva Energy Private Limited
|
GUVNL
GUVNL
|
In the matter of petition of adjudication of dispute under section 86(1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 read
In the matter of petition of adjudication of dispute under section 86(1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with Article 8 of the Power Purchase Agreement dated 07.08.2008 executed between the petitioner and GUVNL, regarding wrongful levy of liquidated damage/ penalty amount of Rs. 44 Lakhs due to nonavailability of the targeted generation during the FY 2012-2013 was a Force Majeure event as per the provisions of the PPA.
|
__ |
